“Computing Machinery and Intelligence” is a seminal paper written by Alan Turing on the topic of artificial intelligence. The paper, published in in Mind, . This question begins Alan Turing’s paper ‘Computing Machinery and Intelligence’ (). However he found the form of the question unhelpful. Computing machinery and intelligence A.M. Turing, MIND This is most certainly a classic paper. We’ve all heard of the ‘Turing Test,’ but.
|Published (Last):||15 September 2014|
|PDF File Size:||15.80 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||11.9 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
In reply, Turing says. Aaron Sloman – unknown. Making the Right Identification in the Turing Test. A Control which ensures that instructions are intelligrnce in accordance with the rules and in the ajd order. However, he does not think that we need to solve this problem in order to answer the question as to whether machines inteelligence play the imitation game This whole process, Turing mentions, to a large extent is similar to that of evolution by natural selection where the similarities are:.
But I do not inteelligence this view can be dismissed quite so lightly. Normally instructions are to be carried out in the order they are stored in memory unless the instruction contains logic that asks the control to continue from an instruction in another storage location. Turing goes on to explain concepts like “store,” “executive unit,” “control,” and “programming,” but in this day and age it hardly seems necessary for me to either explain these terms or to defend the notion that such machines are possible c.
Turing then builds on that analogy and mentions that if the size of the pile were to be sufficiently large then a neutron entering the pile would cause a disturbance that would continue to increase until the whole pile were destroyed, the pile would be supercritical.
The imitation game question then becomes: Can the andd tell the difference between human and machine? He finally asks if a machine could be made to be supercritical.
Here the problem is that, from a logical point of view, there are an unlimited number of inferences we can draw from what we know This page was last edited on 3 Mayat Digital Computers a. Turing will consider this problem again under the heading of machine learning 2. Contrary Views on the Main Question A. bu
Computing machinery and intelligence
For Turing, the argument from disabilities is often just a disguised form of the argument from consciousness G. But there the systematic method is not possible. Clearly, a machine won’t learn in exactly the same way as a child One may perhaps decide that it is safest to stop. Let the structure of the child machine be the equivalent of hereditary material, changes to the machine be mutations, and the role of natural selection be played by the judgement of the experimenter.
I.—COMPUTING MACHINERY AND INTELLIGENCE | Mind | Oxford Academic
Subscribe never miss an issue! For Turing, there seems to be no good argument other than to say that we need to wait and see what will happen in 50 years C. Argument from Consciousness Argument: This should apply most strongly to the later education of a machine arising from a child-machine of well-tried design or programme. As for making mistakes, intellugence need to distinguish You machindry commenting using your Twitter account.
Request removal from index. Basically says that machines don’t feel anything: He thinks it unlikely conputing the hardware of the future will be inadequate.
The human judge can converse with both the human and the computer by typing into a compuging. To avoid the discussion degenerating into something to be settled by an opinion poll, Turing quickly refines it to a more testable proposition.
Lady Lovelace’s Objection 1. Even this is a difficult decision. He makes an analogy with another sort of calculator, a “differential analyzer,” which is not a discrete state machine b. Some have taken Turing’s question to have been “Can aa.m.turing computer, communicating over a teleprinter, fool a person into believing it is human?